Inside the Outside : An Anthology of Avant-Garde American Poets
Author: Roseanne Ritzema (ed) | ISBN: 0977252418 : 9780977252411 | Format: Paperback | Size: 140x215mm | Pages: 304 | Weight: .406 Kg. | Published: Presa Press – December 2005 | Availability: In Print | Subjects: Poetry anthologies: from c1900-
This volume brings together 13 major poets
of the American small press scene, each representing an important branch of the avant-garde as it has developed over the past forty years. Each of the poets is presented in a large selection, in most cases chosen by the poets themselves. They range in age from 41 to 81, their poetics range from visual/conceptual poetry to surrealism, from personal/observation poetry to cut-up & collage poetry. Powerful, touching, innovative & humorous, these poems illuminate the underground poetry scene to give the reader a view of the real new American poetry.
Kirby Congdon, Hugh Fox, Stanley Nelson, Harry Smith, Richard Kostelanetz, A.D. Winans, Lyn Lifshin, Eric Greinke, Lynne Savitt, Doug Holder, John Keene, Mark Sonnenfeld & Richard Morris
Inside The Outside dares to break with poetry conventions and attempt eye-catching formats, and some poems delve into serious and mature subject matters concerning human sexuality, violence and modern social problems. A ‘must-read’ for its truly innovative poetry.” – Midwest Book Review
The publication of INSIDE THE OUTSIDE is a timely tribute to the many fine poets who are unaccountably outside the radar of the large trade houses. This kind of innovative book is evidence to the literary world that America’s poetry is fresh, powerful and above all readable. Its editors deserve kudos for their taste and industry. – Leslie H. Whitten Jr.
Inside The Outside is a remarkable undertaking. I recommend this collection for all collections of contemporary American poetry. – Rattlesnake Review
…let’s hope a venue with a lot of room and rapacious intellectuals (like The New York Review of Books?) will really sink their beaks into this book….It will find its audience and fan base – perhaps even find occasional employment as a text or reference…The book is meant to be a major statement – and I seriously hope it can fly above and beyond the usual small press ghetto boundaries. – Iconoclast
Poets, librarians, collectors, teachers, take note. This book is a prime source. It represents the diversity, power, and anguish of avant-garde American poetry from the 60s onward. Generations to come will use it to learn how writing was lived before the mundane media-centric days of virtual reality.” – Small Press Review
Should we use the term “avant-garde” any more?
It probably caused more trouble than it’s worth. Introducing Inside the Outside: An Anthology of Avant-Garde American Poets, editor Roseanne Ritzema admits that the poets therein use “widely divergent methods” and have significant “philosophical & aesthetic differences,” yet she insists upon their common ground as writers who “seek to break through barriers,” “have been active in the small press movement,” and are often “influenced by sister-arts, such as painting, music and drama” (7-8). Of the thirteen poets collected, at least five—the well-known Lyn Lifshin, Harry Smith, Eric Greinke, A.D. Winans, and Lynne Savitt—utilize traditional narrative or meditative techniques too consistently to be considered experimental. Ritzema is “satisfied that the major schools have been represented” (8), but where is a “Language,” a New York School, or a Black Mountain poet? While John Keene is a gay African-American experimentalist, at least one Asian-American innovative writer and a clearly experimental feminist woman should have been included. Nevertheless, the odd stylistic diversity of Ritzema’s anthology makes it an exciting test for readers who fancy themselves as poetic pluralists. My focus here will be on three especially engaging experimental poets.
The book features a generous selection from the work of Richard Kostelanetz, a major figure in the multi-genre “Avant-Garde” since the late sixties. In Kostelanetz’s “Visual Poem (Black/White),” a symmetrically fragmented rectangle, “WHITE” disappears, letter by letter, into its first letter on the top left-hand side and moves from just “E” to its totality in a nicely incongruous black boldface on the lower right (87). This movement is reversed with “BLACK on the lower left and upper right respectively. Therefore, both terms in this most striking of binary oppositions articulate their contrast and also succumb to diminution in each other’s formidable presence. However, the poem’s most intriguing feature is the quasi-diamond shaped center, in which “BLACK” diagonals flow from top to bottom and “WHITE” ones from bottom to top. Perhaps Kostelanetz asks us to see white as a reversal of the “logical” visual progression of black type on a page. Further, if we read the poem’s central diamond as horizontal lines, the top word is “BE,” and the rest are suggestive nonce words. Then again, if one frames the poem as a commentary on U.S. racial relations—before non-black/non-white categories gained the mainstream’s attention—then s/he can see that notions of appearance/disappearance are played out in four segregated corners and that the center features a desegregated complexity.
Kostelanetz’s abecedarian poem “MULTIPLE GHOSTS” (92-96)uses boldface for certain groups of letters (separated from other such groups) in a word to allow other words to emerge from within each one. In the title, one might expansively read: “Multiple ghosts tip hosts.” Apparitional or not, these extra words offer gratuitous signification to words in whose “houses” they reside. They “tip” us off about the signifier’s “materiality” and its “liberation.” “AMBIGUOUS” (ambiguous big us) alerts his community to the impressive size and potential of doubling discourse.
Like Kostelanetz, John Keene often calls attention to the visual and material presence of language. “’Inbetweenness’ (Morton Feldman)” literally foregrounds the framing of words by placing different parts of his carefully spaced poetic lines in boxes, some of which overlap or bisect one another. The bisections mimic liminal territory of the “music’s/ lyric revolt” against “the persistence/ of dead systems” (185) and thus provide a complication of caesuras in what is otherwise a straightforward Romantic homage.
In Keene’s “Prisms,” a vertical line down the center of two staggered columns with one-line stanzas complicates reading: even if this thin line seems a barrier to jagged horizontal scanning and a warning that the columns are segregated from one another’s poesis, it also dares us to leap over and subvert proscription. Let’s trying reading the title and first six left-hand lines,
Prisms/// attack motion// less mathematical than lyrical// effort notation// iconographic force// private ghosts dialogue// catching scribble,” and the first six right-hand lines, “Richter echo// breathing thinking// emotional event in mark// emanating splendor// by sensograph and eye// pictorial storms,” “Prisms/// attach motion/ Richter echo/ less mathematical than lyrical/ breathing thinking/ effort notation/ emotional event in mark/ iconographic force/ emanating splendor/ private ghosts dialogue/ by sensograph and eye/ catching scribble/ pictorial storms
against a unifying of the columns: (190). Even if unfolding of syntax, rhythm, and thought in the two columns and in the diagonal version are similar, and even if all can be considered meditations on prisms, interesting differences surface. To cite only one of several good examples, prisms’ “attack” on “motion” constituting “lyrical// effort notation” is not the same thing as this “attack” behaving as an “echo” (measurable on the “Richter” scale) that embodies “lyrical/ breathing thinking” before it is also recognized as “effort notation.” While the attachment of “lyrical” to “effort notation” is sublimely incongruous, the linkage of “lyrical” and “breathing” (as in bardic inspiration) seems much more “natural.” Multiple possibilities of signification proliferate further in Keene’s “Geodesy” (189) and “Oscillation” (195), in which five columns (without a separating line) of five words each can be read vertically, horizontally, and perhaps diagonally.
Perhaps my claim that Ritzema did not include Language Poetry in this anthology is only nominally accurate. Though historically unaffiliated with this group, Mark Sonnenfeld fractures continuity in ways that make his work resemble a good deal to be found in anthologies like Ron Silliman’s In the American Tree. In “flower green repellent tip a) spec dualism,” disjunctive effects are densely staged:
all in-between anyway to what I suppose is going
claw style sil crafts this crafts this knuckle language at
least in vertigo, alouds, contingency,
scream systema hoods pru for the drop
like notes in its analysis from unknown
like there suppose (ache, pound) (263)
Setting his sights on the “vertigo” of “contingency,” an “in-between” that does not gently synthesize but aggressively “screams,” “aches,” and “pounds” against comfortably known “systema,” Sonnenfeld uses a “claw(ing) style” to re-“craft” grammar and syntax, turning the adverb “aloud” into the third-person singular verb or plural noun “alouds,” and he shatters prudence into the untranslatable but viscerally cogent “pru for the drop.”
Reminiscent of Ashbery’s poems in The Tennis Court Oath that were so important to early Language poetry, the fifteen numbered fragmentary utterances of Sonnenfeld’s “1. vomit” offer meaning in the process of disappearance or dis-integration: “9. Gooney. one of the manhole./ 10. is red airfoil is variation./ 11. film treatment tablelands./ 12. small limp tumble two:nine” (268). Sonnenfeld sometimes assails the integrity of the word, as in a brief poem’s opening part:
Vh dden transmitterunderio/ rehsilLd-// F a t ramaticalil term a n (,s)ckjeep C., nHorndo (279).
As in the work of Steve McCaffery and David Melnick’s Pcoet, the more recognizable vestiges of words, piled together, tease the reader into trying to find a sensible transmitter hidden under the jumble—with “tra(u)matic” non-results.
Inside the Outside would be a misleading starting point for someone seeking to get up to speed on the innovative poetry of the last thirty or so years, but it helpfully covers some material that other collections usually leave out. For those who already read a good deal of this kind of writing, I can report that it introduced me to Keene and Sonnenfeld’s writing and made me more fully aware of the variety and range of Kostelanetz’s poetry. by Thomas Fink
is the author of four books of poetry, mostly recently No Appointment Necessary (Moria Poetry, 2006) and After Taxes (Marsh Hawk Press, 2004), an e-chapbook, Staccato Landmark (Beard of Bees, 2006), and two books of criticism on contemporary poetry. His work has appeared in Talisman, Verse, Jacket, Chicago Review, Denver Quarterly, American Poetry Review, Barrow Street, Otoliths, and numerous other journals. His paintings hang in various collections.
Book version (incl. shipment cost world-wide)